D Olden, Julian
- Institutionen för vilt, fisk och miljö, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
- University of Washington
Forskningsartikel2024Vetenskapligt granskadÖppen tillgång
Guareschi, Simone; Mathers, Kate L.; South, Josie; Navarro, Laetitia M.; Renals, Trevor; Hiley, Alice; Antonsich, Marco; Bolpagni, Rossano; Bortolus, Alejandro; Genovesi, Piero; Jere, Arthertone; Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C.; Phaka, Fortunate M.; Novoa, Ana; Olden, Julian D.; Sacco, Mattia; Shackleton, Ross T.; Vila, Montserrat; Wood, Paul J.
In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species, perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions. Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue.
conservation biology; human-wildlife interactions; invasive species; invasion science; natural resource management
Bioscience
2024, volym: 74, nummer: 12, sidor: 825-839
Utgivare: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Tvärvetenskapliga studier
Ekologi
Vilt- och fiskeförvaltning
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/133139