A reinvestigation of cognitive styles in sticklebacks: decision success varies with behavioral type

Sammanfattning

The "cognitive styles" hypothesis suggests that individual differences in behavior are associated with variation in cognitive performance via underlying speed-accuracy trade-offs. While this is supported, in part, by a growing body of evidence, some studies did not find the expected relationships between behavioral type and cognitive performance. In some cases, this may reflect methodological limitations rather than the absence of a true relationship. The physical design of the testing arena and the number of choices offered in an assay can hinder our ability to detect inter-individual differences in cognitive performance. Here, we re-investigated the cognitive styles hypothesis in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), adapting the maze design of a previous study which found no cost to decision success by faster (bolder) individuals. We used a similar design but increased the size of the maze and incorporated an additional choice in the form of a third maze arm. We found, in accordance with cognitive style expectations, that individuals who were consistently slower to emerge from the start chamber made fewer errors than fish that emerged faster. Activity in an open field test, however, did not show evidence of a relationship with decision success, possibly due to the low number of repeated observations per fish in this separate assay. Our results provide further empirical support for the cognitive styles hypothesis and highlight important methodological aspects to consider in studies of inter-individual differences in cognition.Inter-individual variation in cognitive ability is hypothesized to be associated with behavioral traits through trade-offs between speed and performance. Previous research testing a common model species-the stickleback-did not find evidence to support the expected relationship between decision success and behavioral type. Using a more challenging test, with an additional choice and larger maze, we found that individuals that emerge faster (i.e. "bolder") were also more error-prone, as predicted by the cognitive style hypothesis.

Nyckelord

animal personality; behavioral trait; cognition; decision-making; methods; speed-accuracy trade-offs

Publicerad i

Behavioral Ecology
2025, volym: 36, nummer: 1, artikelnummer: arae097
Utgivare: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC

SLU författare

• Munson, Amelia

  • Institutionen för vilt, fisk och miljö, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
    
  • University of Glasgow

UKÄ forskningsämne

Etologi
Ekologi

Publikationens identifierare

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae097

Permanent länk till denna sida (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/139874