Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review

Callier, Myriam D.; Byron, Carrie J.; Bengtson, David A.; Cranford, Peter J.; Cross, Stephen F.; Focken, Ulfert; Jansen, Henrice M.; Kamermans, Pauline; Kiessling, Anders; Landry, Thomas; O'Beirn, Francis; Petersson, Erik; Rheault, Robert B.; Strand, Oivind; Sundell, Kristina; Svasand, Terje; Wikfors, Gary H.; McKindsey, Christopher W.

doi:10.1111/raq.12208

Review article2018Peer reviewedOpen access

Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review

Callier, Myriam D.; Byron, Carrie J.; Bengtson, David A.; Cranford, Peter J.; Cross, Stephen F.; Focken, Ulfert; Jansen, Henrice M.; Kamermans, Pauline; Kiessling, Anders; Landry, Thomas; O'Beirn, Francis; Petersson, Erik; Rheault, Robert B.; Strand, Oivind; Sundell, Kristina; Svasand, Terje; Wikfors, Gary H.; McKindsey, Christopher W.

Abstract

Knowledge of aquaculture-environment interactions is essential for the development of a sustainable aquaculture industry and efficient marine spatial planning. The effects of fish and shellfish farming on sessile wild populations, particularly infauna, have been studied intensively. Mobile fauna, including crustaceans, fish, birds and marine mammals, also interact with aquaculture operations, but the interactions are more complex and these animals may be attracted to (attraction) or show an aversion to (repulsion) farm operations with various degrees of effects. This review outlines the main mechanisms and effects of attraction and repulsion of wild animals to/from marine finfish cage and bivalve aquaculture, with a focus on effects on fisheries-related species. Effects considered in this review include those related to the provision of physical structure (farm infrastructure acting as fish aggregating devices (FADs) or artificial reefs (ARs), the provision of food (e.g. farmed animals, waste feed and faeces, fouling organisms associated with farm structures) and some farm activities (e.g. boating, cleaning). The reviews show that the distribution of mobile organisms associated with farming structures varies over various spatial (vertical and horizontal) and temporal scales (season, feeding time, day/night period). Attraction/repulsion mechanisms have a variety of direct and indirect effects on wild organisms at the level of individuals and populations and may have implication for the management of fisheries species and the ecosystem in the context of marine spatial planning. This review revealed considerable uncertainties regarding the long-term and ecosystem-wide consequences of these interactions. The use of modelling may help better understand consequences, but long-term studies are necessary to better elucidate effects.

Keywords

aquaculture; artificial reefs; attraction; farm waste; fish aggregating devices; repulsion; wild population

Published in

Reviews in Aquaculture
2018, volume: 10, number: 4, pages: 924-949
Publisher: WILEY

SLU Authors

Kiessling, Anders
- Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Petersson, Erik
- Department of Aquatic Resources (SLU Aqua), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Global goals (SDG)

SDG2 Zero hunger
SDG14 Life below water

UKÄ Subject classification

Fish and Aquacultural Science

Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12208

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/97273